Monday, March 19, 2012

March 2012-2: February Stan Award


news
February Sustainable Stan award Winner
The winner of the Sustainable Stan Award in February 2012 was Kevin Shelley, AIA, LEED AP BD+C.  Kevin is the Project Manager for several Ball State projects (Dehority Complex, Studebaker East Residence Hall -currently in construction, and upcoming Johnson A Residence Hall). 


The Dehority complex was the first Ball State project to achieve LEED certification (it achieved Silver in February 2010). The Studebaker East and Johnson A Residence Halls are also expected to achieve a minimum of LEED silver certification.  To achieve such high performing design requires a thorough understanding of the facilities' systems and environment, not only for the Design Team but for the Owner as well.  
Schmidt Associates make a conscientiousness effort to keep its staff educated  on a variety of subjects including sustainable design, through a continuing education program they developed called Schmidt Academy. Last month, Kevin was instrumental in taking Schmidt Academy on the road and informing Ball State users of the benefits of sustainable design in their projects.  Using the Studebaker East project as a case study, the presentation addressed the benefits of the chilled beam HVAC system, and the solar studies that were used to help address daylighting in spaces, as well as other ways the project achieved LEED credits.


The projects themselves help educate the users and the public on sustainability, but Kevin's efforts to bridge the gap between the built environment and thought behind the design really connects the users with the project.  Kevin is highly deserving of the coveted Sustainable Stan Award for his work with Ball State University. Congratulations Mr. Shelley. 





Tuesday, March 6, 2012

March 2012-1: UnderSTANding LEED


news
Sustainable Stan Journal reformatting
Are you tired of waiting an entire month (sometimes even more) to get your fill of the Sustainable Stan Journal? Don't bother responding, we know you are.  To address this issue (and other issues you may not be aware of), we have decided to issue pieces of the Journal in smaller bites spread out throughout each month.  So what does that mean, you ask? It means the Sustainable Stan Journal posts will be more frequent, but they will not be as long.  We will still try to maintain the typical segments - project of the month, news, and opinion - throughout a month's time.


This took a while to decide, and that is why we have missed the month of February this year (that, and it doesn't have as many days). So I would like to apologize for the missed month. Hopefully you will appreciate the new format and visit more often.


To start off this month, we have an interesting article regarding synthetic turf.
Enjoy,
                                                                                                                      .                                                                                                                                                                                                                          




UnderSTANding LEED:
Synthetic Turf is Greener than it Looks
by Kyle Miller, PE, LEED AP BD+C

Synthetic Turf is MUCH MORE than a Good Economic Choice
Football fields have been going green lately - that is green as in sustainable and good for the environment. We all think back to the Friday night high school football game or the cool Saturday afternoon college games. We can also associate green with the color of the field, or the color of the stains on the uniforms, or even the smell of the freshly mowed field. However, over the past decade, synthetic turf athletic fields have started to emerge all over the world - and not just for football. The original idea was a more durable, long-lasting field that could withstand hours of play in all weather conditions without a worry of wearing out the grass. The initial costs of these fields were high, but the economic payback would be much higher. Today, many sports at all levels are played on synthetic turf. These primarily include football, soccer, baseball, field hockey, lacrosse, rugby, and tennis. In some instances, homeowners and businesses have even replaced their grass lawns with synthetic turf.

With care for our environment becoming perhaps as important as the economics, now there is another reason to choose a synthetic turf field over the traditional grass field. Synthetic turf surfaces of the past were merely carpets on top of a concrete slab. The industry has come a long way recently, and the “new” synthetic turf fields offer many environmental benefits - even though they involve plastic and rubber!


The Basics
The basic design of a modern synthetic turf field includes a compacted subgrade, drainage tiles, stone base, backing pad, synthetic fibers, and infill material. The object is to replicate a natural turf field as closely as possible - in feel, play, and appearance. While a variety of colors are available (we have all seen blue at Boise State), green is the most widely used.



Environmental Benefits
Of course there are many other benefits (primarily use time and economics) to choosing synthetic turf in lieu of natural turf. However, there are also many environmental benefits as well:

·         Elimination harmful pesticides, fungicides, fertilizers, and herbicides.
·         Eliminates the need for mowing and aeration, conserving fuel and reducing pollution.
·         Removes grass clippings and thousands of tires from landfills.
·         Eliminates the need for irrigation systems, and drastically reduces the need for water.
·         Materials are 100% reclaimable and recyclable.
·         Storm water drains directly and quickly through the synthetic turf system, reducing surface drainage issues often associated with natural turf fields.
·         The issues of “lead” and “excessive” heat have been associated with these fields over the years; however, manufacturers have proactively adjusted their materials and systems to eliminate these concerns.
·         Natural turf fields that are not properly constructed and regularly maintained cause more injuries that synthetic turf systems which require minimal maintenance.

LEED Credits
Synthetic turf fields and lawns can contribute to the following LEED credits:
WE Credit 1.1:   Water Efficient Landscaping: Reduce by 50%
WE Credit 1.2:   Water Efficient Landscaping: No Potable Water Use or No Irrigation
MR Credit 2.1:   Construction Waste Management: Divert 50% from Disposal
MR Credit 2.2:   Construction Waste Management: Divert 75% from Disposal
MR Credit 3.1:   Materials Reuse: 5%
MR Credit 3.2:   Materials Reuse: 10%
MR Credit 4.1:   Recycled Content: 10% (post-consumer + ½ pre-consumer)
MR Credit 4.2:   Recycled Content: 20% (post-consumer + ½ pre-consumer)
MR Credit 5.1:   Regional Materials: 10% Extracted, Processed, & Manufactured Regionally
MR Credit 5.2:   Regional Materials: 20% Extracted, Processed, & Manufactured Regionally


Synthetic turf fields have become a viable option for fields when weighing the maintenance and upkeep of conventional natural turf fields.  Although first costs may discourage some Owners from looking into these fields, life-cycle costing may demonstrate the savings these fields provide in the long run.